A housing issue: McCain not sure how many they own

By DOUGLASS K. DANIEL, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - Days after he cracked that being rich in the U.S. meant earning at least $5 million a year, Republican presidential candidate John McCain acknowledged that he wasn't sure how many houses he and his wealthy wife actually own.

"I think — I'll have my staff get to you," McCain responded to a question posed by Politico, according to a story Thursday on the publication's Web site. "It's condominiums where — I'll have them get to you."

Later, the McCain campaign told Politico that McCain and his wife, Cindy, have at least four in three states, Arizona, California and Virginia. Newsweek recently estimated the two owned at least seven properties.

On the campaign trail, McCain doesn't refer to his wife's wealth, estimated by some at $100 million and based on her late father's Arizona beer distributorship. McCain's campaign didn't respond immediately to a request for comment Thursday.

Contniued Here

McCain Revises His Definition Of ‘Rich’: Some People ‘Are Poor If They’re Billionaires’

Petraeus draws criticism for saying Christian book ‘should be in every rucksack.’

Posted by PoliShifter at 09:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

Heard about this on Thom Hartmann yesterday.

Rove has big plans for 2008.

More information can be found at: VelvetRevolution.us - The RoveCyberGate Campaign

Republican whistleblower Stephen Spoonamore has come forward and disclosed how electronic voting can be hacked. Karl Rove has been stealing elections since 2000 with the help of Michael Connell. Apparently Spoonamore was working for the McCain campaign until he became so disgusted with the tactics being used by Republicans to win elections that he came forward.

Michael Connell runs govtech.com, a company that handles all the websites for members of Congress. Pretty handy huh? Ah, to be able to read all the Democrat's emails and internal communications...who needs FISA when you have Connell?

Behind the firewall: Bush loyalist Mike Connell controls Congressional secrets as his email sites serve Karl Rove

In 2001, Michael L. Connell of GovTech Solutions, L.L.C., a notoriously partisan GOP operative and Bush family confidant, was selected to re-organize the Capitol Hill IT network. Under the guise of selecting a female-owned IT company (Connell’s wife Heather is listed as the owner), former Congressman and convicted felon Bob Ney reportedly arranged for Connell to be the man behind the firewall for the U.S. House of Representatives. Connell’s role and activities need to be investigated by putting Connell under oath and examining how arguably one of the country’s most zealously partisan IT specialists managed to land the contract and be allowed access to this electronic communication system. More Here

On Thom Hartmann Mark Crispin Miller said Connell helped Rove steal elections in order to "save babies".

The Brad Blog - GOP Tech Guru Mike Connell 'High IQ Forrest Gump...At Scene of Every Single Crime' Say Ohio Attorneys

The Brad Blog - Rove Threatened GOP IT Guru If He Does Not 'Take the Fall' for Election Fraud in Ohio, Says Attorney

Ohio Attorneys to Assert RICO Claim Against Karl Rove for Orchestrating Theft of 2004 Election

Voting Machines Can Never Be Trusted, Says GOP Computer Security Expert Stephen Spoonamore

GOP cyber-security expert suggests Diebold tampered with 2002 election

A leading cyber-security expert and former adviser to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) says he has fresh evidence regarding election fraud on Diebold electronic voting machines during the 2002 Georgia gubernatorial and senatorial elections. Contnues Here

Highlights from the Spoonamore Interview
Segment 1: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZAyEfovA404
Segment 2: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vTBLfgos5b8
Segment 3: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SzKbigGoMoo
Segment 4: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vNvweInGFs
Segment 5: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rX8fRwsTpoQ
Segment 6: www.youtube.com/watch?v=m9Kq4dxPwY8
Segment 7: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsgY4_BB2lo
Segment 8: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jy1sz-xBxf8

Posted by PoliShifter at 06:41 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

Rachel Maddow to Replace Dan Abrams on MSNBC

Just in time for the closing rush of the presidential election, MSNBC is shaking up its prime-time programming lineup, removing the long-time host –- and one-time general manager of the network — Dan Abrams from his 9 p.m. program and replacing him with Rachel Maddow, who has emerged as a favored political commentator for the all-news cable channel.

The moves, which were confirmed by MSNBC executives Tuesday, are expected to be finalized by Wednesday, with Mr. Abrams’s last program on Thursday. After MSNBC’s extensive coverage of the two political conventions during the next two weeks, Ms. Maddow will begin her program on Sept. 8. More Here

Rachel Speaks...

Posted by PoliShifter at 06:23 PM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

I for one find this modern version of Evangelical Christianity thoroughly disgusting. It’s a complete perversion of the teachings of Jesus Christ.

I realize and understand that there are many “good” Christians out there who are compassionate, Love Thy Neighbor, help the poor, don’t pass judgment, and try in general to live a Christ-like life. They are not concerned with the trappings of wealth and power. Their concerns are living a good life, being a good neighbor, and caring for their family.

But those true Christians are not being represented by their leadership in the Church. Case in point was last Friday’s Saddleback Church Q&A. Pretty much the entire right wing Evangelical movement can be boiled down to two planks: anti-abortion and anti gay marriage. That’s it. Those are the two issues right wing Christians seem to be concerned with at least according to their current leadership.

I don’t seem to recall Jesus rallying against gay marriage in the Bible. While Jesus had tremendous respect for life I don’t seem to recall reading about him giving sermon after sermon about how abortion needed to be made illegal. Jesus preached helping the poor. Jesus said it was the sick that needed a doctor, not the healthy. Jesus spent his time with thieves and hookers. Jesus did not judge those seen as sinners and impure by society. Instead he opened his arms to them, gave them love, and showed them compassion.

Jesus also stood for peace. "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called sons of God" (Matthew 5:9). Jesus stood for peace so much that he was crucified rather than have Jerusalem go to war with Rome. At that time Jerusalem was occupied by Rome and many Jews wanted open war with Rome. Jesus knew this would lead to the slaughter of his people so he prevented that war from happening by sacrificing himself. Yet this current brand of Evangelical Christian leadership is hell bent on war with Iran and stoking the flames of Armageddon. How is that Christ-like? Jesus did NOT say Blessed are the warmakers people!

At a rally in Washington D.C. last week Mike Huckabee gave a prayer asking God to forgive America for the 50 million killed. The 50 million he was referring to are the supposed number of abortions since Rove vs. Wade. That’s all fine and well. Perhaps America needs forgiveness for not only failing to care for the unborn but the born as well. Who cares for the sick, the children without parents or with only one parent, and the poor? Isn’t that really what Jesus concerned him self with the most? The Bible says so.

How about some prayers for the millions of dead Iraqis? What about some prayers for the Japanese we fried with nuclear weapons? How about the thousands of dead and injured U.S. Soldiers? I guess I just get frustrated when it seems time and time again that so-called Christians care more for the un-born than they do for the living. They are not pro-life they are pro-fetus for time and time again we have seen the leadership in the Evangelical movement calling for the destruction of America’s enemies. Go head and pray for the un-born but pray for the living as well. How can you care for the unborn in one hand and call for the destruction of people in the other? It’s that type of blatant hypocrisy Jesus condemned the most.

I just think it’s sick and sad that the entire modern Evangelical movement can be summed up with two very simple and narrow minded views: anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage. That’s it. If you are anti-abortion and anti-gay marriage you are considered a “good” Christian.

Look at the questions Pastor Warren asked Obama and McCain. Look how the candidates were judged. Their worthiness as Christians was determined not by how much they love their neighbor, help the sick, and show compassion for the least among us but rather by how strong their stance was against abortion and gay marriage. They weren’t rated by their willingness to work toward world peace and how much they help the poor but rather if they supported a Constitutional amendment defining marriage as between a man and a woman.

If Jesus were to come back he would be disgusted. Pastor Warren had the stage for several hours and a platform tailor made for delivering the teachings of Jesus Christ. He could have asked about peace, love, compassion, making peace, and helping the poor, the CORE of Christ’s teachings, yet instead he chose to focus on what modern Evangelical Christianity has become: an anti abortion and anti-gay marriage institution.

It’s tainted Christianity to say the least. Being a “good” Christian is a hell of a lot more than just opposing abortion and gay marriage. It’s about living the teachings of Jesus Christ. The teachings of Christ are love your neighbor as yourself, do to others as you would have them do to you. Care for the least among you. Don’t pass judgment lest you be judged yourself. Promote peace NOT war. Those are the teachings of Christ. It has nothing to do with opposing gay marriage. It has nothing to do with judging and condemning those who do not believe as you do.

The current Evangelical leadership should be ashamed of themselves.

Thou blind Pharisee, cleanse first that which is within the cup and platter, that the outside of them may be clean also-In Luke (Lu 11:40)

Posted by PoliShifter at 10:03 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)

I wondered the whole time during the Saddle Back Evangelical Interview if it wasn't being orchestrated to favor McCain. Supposedly each candidate would not hear the other's responses to cherry picked questions nor would they know what questions were being asked. I think a coin flip decided who went first...it was Obama. Presumably McCain was in a sound proof box unable to hear the questions or Obama's responses.

Well McCain wasn't in a sound proof box. Instead he was in a motorcade. And, living in Southern California and having been traveling on the freeway at that time I know for a fact that KNX1070 was broadcasting LIVE Obama's responses to Pastor Warren's questions. Yet we are to believe that McCain didn't listen one bit to what Obama said or what questions he was asked.

The New York Times reports Despite Assurances, McCain Wasn’t in a ‘Cone of Silence’

By KATHARINE Q. SEELYE
Published: August 17, 2008

ORLANDO, Fla. — Senator John McCain was not in a “cone of silence” on Saturday night while his rival, Senator Barack Obama, was being interviewed at the Saddleback Church in California.

Members of the McCain campaign staff, who flew here Sunday from California, said Mr. McCain was in his motorcade on the way to the church as Mr. Obama was being interviewed by the Rev. Rick Warren, the author of the best-selling book “The Purpose Driven Life.”

The matter is of interest because Mr. McCain, who followed Mr. Obama’s hourlong appearance in the forum, was asked virtually the same questions as Mr. Obama. Mr. McCain’s performance was well received, raising speculation among some viewers, especially supporters of Mr. Obama, that he was not as isolated during the Obama interview as Mr. Warren implied.

Nicolle Wallace, a spokeswoman for Mr. McCain, said on Sunday night that Mr. McCain had not heard the broadcast of the event while in his motorcade and heard none of the questions.

“The insinuation from the Obama campaign that John McCain, a former prisoner of war, cheated is outrageous,” Ms. Wallace said.

How far does the whole POW thing really go? To me, just the fact that they had to use it here smells of guilt. What in the hell does McCain's POW status have to do with whether or not he listened to Obama on the radio on his way to Saddleback Church?

What, just because he was a POW we are to believe he can do no wrong? All of a sudden he is infallible? Did he become Jesus Christ while in the Hanoi Hilton?

It smells rotten and sounds rotten. It sounds guilty. "Why, how dare you question John McCain, he was a POW for Pete's Sake! He's a war hero!".

I have a feeling we will be hearing the POW defense quite often between now and November.

Posted by PoliShifter at 01:17 AM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

Thom Hartmann was mentioning last week that Russian newspapers are speculating that the invasion of South Ossetia by Georgia was done in order to boost John McCain’s chances in November. John McCain had lobbyists for Georgia working on his campaign until just this past March.

Karl Rove has been working with the McCain camp since about July. Ever since the McCain camp has adopted a more Rovian style approach to politics. Exploiting war for political advantage is a hallmark of Karl Rove campaigning.

The speculation is that while the Administration would like to attack Iran there is sufficient resistance in the U.S. and world community to such a move. Thus, Rove began looking at the globe, flipping through his rolodex, and reviewing his political connections abroad trying to determine where he could start a military conflict. The very basic thinking is that McCain = War Hero, War = McCain Presidency. Any war is perceived by the Republican Party to benefit John McCain.

While we have all been focused on Iraq, Afghanistan, and Iran the Bush Administration has been constantly poking Russia primarily with the proposed Eastern European missile defense shield. Also, BushCo has been actively trying to recruit former Soviet states into NATO in addition to getting them to enter into other agreements with Western European countries. This has irritated Russia.

What’s still not clear is who called who and who told who what. Some how Saakashvili got the impression from people in the U.S. that if Georgia invaded South Ossetia, they would get the backing of the U.S. military. Of course that didn’t happen but we did get Russia thoroughly pissed off, a military conflict of politically sufficient size, and a great big push toward World War 3 involving Russia.

This is all thought to benefit McCain who will then puff his chest up and talk about his military experience. Most of you will think it a crazy notion that the U.S. government dominated by Loyal Bushies would act in such a way as to endanger all our lives merely for the political benefit of a fellow Republican. But to you I say just look how the Bush Cheney regime has acted historically.

As soon as Bush Cheney took office they began planning the invasion of Iraq 6 months prior to 9/11. They began their domestic spying 6 months before 9/11. Their whole thought was how to get the U.S. involved in a war. They did this because they knew Americans rarely if ever “change horses in mid-stride”. That is to say, if there was a war during Bush’s first term, the American People would likely keep him in office since he would be a “War Time President”.

This is what the Republicans parroted all through 2004 “Bush is a War Time President” and “You can’t change horses in mid-stride”. Everything they did was aimed at getting Bush re-elected in 2004. Their whole motive was to maintain power.

So why should now be any different? Is it really that far fetched to think the Bush Cheney regime would help boost McCain’s campaign with a military conflict? Bush Cheney see in McCain a puppet who they can control remotely. Having McCain as President is the same as having Bush Cheney running things.

The question that remains to be seen is if the American People will fall for it. Will they say “gee we need a military man as President since we are at war”. Keep in mind they voted against John Kerry (a military man) in favor of a draft dodger (Bush) in a time of war. McCain is the right kind of military man for them, someone who to this day supports the Vietnam War and thinks the U.S. could have won if we only had more resolve. If only those damn dirty fucking hippies with their rock music didn’t mess it all up.

By shifting the conflict away from the Middle East and instead making it with Russia it makes Americans more susceptible to their propaganda. Americans have 50 years of inbred hatred of the Russians. We’ve had Red Scares and been on the brink of nuclear war with Russia for pretty much everyone’s current lifetime. The Georgian conflict has ignited that hatred as simply as flipping a switch. No one’s thinking about the consequences except that we can’t let the damn Ruskies get away with it.

Just remember this time around Bush Cheney are picking on a country that has an air force, navy, nuclear subs, and lest I forget to mention thousands of nuclear warheads aimed at the United States. It’s one thing to bully Iraq, Afghanistan, and even Iran. It’s quite another to try to bully Russia.

You also have to ask yourself do Bush Cheney really care about you? Do you think they are concerned about losing a few million American lives if it means maintaining power? Look how they have treated Iraq, Afghanistan, Hurricane Katrina, and now this current conflict. They wait for significant loss of life and damage to property before acting. What we see as death and chaos they see as lucrative rebuilding contracts for Halliburton and security jobs for BlackWater USA.

Posted by PoliShifter at 10:51 AM | Permalink | Comments (4) | TrackBacks (0)

Who is the brainiac that decided to continue negotiating with Poland to put a missile defense shield there when Russia which has already invaded Georgia has voiced strong opposition to it? Talk about fueling the fire. It almost seems as if the United States wants war with Russia. I guess we loved the Cold War so much that we want to start another one.

The whole situation in Georgia is bizarre. Don’t get me wrong, Russia is no saint. But in this case it seems the United States provoked the entire conflict. The U.S. trained and equipped Georgian troops. When Georgia asked if we would support their invasion of South Ossetia the U.S. said yes.

And why is it no one ever talks about what started the Russian invasion of Georgia? It was Georgia that invaded South Ossetia provoking a Russian response. Russia is not innocent in all of this but neither is the U.S. or Georgia. The media however acts like Russia invaded Georgia unprovoked.

All the headlines are slanted as well to favor Georgia and the U.S. The big one yesterday that was splashed all over various news agencies was “Russia: 'Forget' Georgian territorial integrity”. On first blush the headline makes it sound like Russia is going to annex Georgia again. But if one bothers to read the article one sees it is with respect to South Ossetia and Abkhazia. Both of these territories have been “breakaway” provinces or “autonomous Republics” ever since the dissolution of the Soviet Union.

Georgia has little or no say over these regions. If they want to become part of Russia then so be it. Why should we use our troops and money to stop Russia from annexing two areas that want to be part of Russia? What effect does it really have on Georgia? To me it seems like just an excuse to broaden the war and bring U.S. troops into the region.

Just a quick note: Think Halliburton and KBR will get contracts to rebuild Georgia? Will BlackWater USA provide the security?

US, Poland Reach Agreement On Anti-Missile Defense Deal

WARSAW, Poland — Poland and the United States struck a deal Thursday that will strengthen military ties and put an American missile interceptor base in Poland, a plan that has infuriated Moscow and sparked fears in Europe of a new arms race. Contnues Here

Russia: Poland risks attack because of US missiles

By JIM HEINTZ, Associated Press Writer '

MOSCOW - A top Russian general said Friday that Poland's agreement to accept a U.S. missile interceptor base exposes the ex-communist nation to attack, possibly by nuclear weapons, the Interfax news agency reported.

The statement by Gen. Anatoly Nogovitsyn is the strongest threat that Russia has issued against the plans to put missile defense elements in former Soviet satellite nations.

Poland and the United States on Thursday signed a deal for Poland to accept a missile interceptor base as part of a system the United States says is aimed at blocking attacks by rogue nations. Moscow, however, feels it is aimed at Russia's missile force.

"Poland, by deploying (the system) is exposing itself to a strike — 100 percent," Nogovitsyn, the deputy chief of staff, was quoted as saying.

He added, in clear reference to the agreement, that Russia's military doctrine sanctions the use of nuclear weapons "against the allies of countries having nuclear weapons if they in some way help them." Nogovitsyn that would include elements of strategic deterrence systems, he said, according to Interfax.

At a news conference earlier Friday, Nogovitsyn had reiterated Russia's frequently stated warning that placing missile-defense elements in Poland and the Czech Republic would bring an unspecified military response. But his subsequent reported statement substantially stepped up a war of words.

Polish Foreign Minister Radek Sikorski was quoted Friday by the Polish news agency PAP as saying that Poland is open to Russian inspections because it wants to give Moscow "tangible proof" that the planned base is not directed against Russia.

U.S. officials have said the timing of the deal was not meant to antagonize Russian leaders at a time when relations already are strained over the recent fighting between Russia and Georgia over the separatist Georgian region of South Ossetia. Continues Here [emph. added]

We either have idiots running this country or they know exactly what they are doing and want more conflict with Russia.

It's been interesting to watch how quickly the NeoCons and Republicans can start hating Russians again. What happened to the global war on terror? What about brown skinned Muslims? We going to forget about all them now that we have the Red Commie Ruskies to hate again? Didn't we get enough of the 40 year Cold War? Do we really need another?

Don't look now but Bush and Mukasey are EXPANDING Domestic Spying. We are inches away people from becoming a Fascist Dictatorship. FISA was just the begining.

Mukasey Says He’ll Give FBI More Authority to Gather Intelligence

U.S. May Ease Police Spy Rules

The Justice Department has proposed a new domestic spying measure that would make it easier for state and local police to collect intelligence about Americans, share the sensitive data with federal agencies and retain it for at least 10 years.

Posted by PoliShifter at 08:32 AM | Permalink | Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

Throughout World History innovation has driven societal advancement.

Most of the time governments and rulers are reactive rather than proactive when it comes to adapting to new technologies. Take for example electrical power plants. Their advent and the wiring of homes for electric lights propelled American society forward. It was such a huge innovation that government was forced to react to it nearly caught off guard as to just how societal changing electrification would. The same argument can be made for the train, the car, the plane, and a whole host of other inventions where innovation propelled us forward despite government's best efforts to hold us back.

Most of the time government is regressive as we have seen with the oil industry. Many in government seek to protect the industry rather than create the conditions that would require it to adapt. There is a tug of war in Congress between those who represent dying industries desperately trying to hold on to their profit and those who are trying to innovate the future and make America a better place.

We I am pleased that it was recently reported about a project that just might propel us into the 21st Century. Government is finally starting to take seriously some of the alternative possibilities to oil. Researcher J.C. Bell, CEO of Bell Bio-Energy, Inc has produced bacteria that can turn any decaying organic material to oil. Trash, vegetable matter, cow manure, and food waste can all be used as a source to produce oil.

This has gotten the attention of the DoD who is funding the production of three test plants for cost-benefit analysis. It is thought in 18 months the plants will produce 500,000 barrels of oil a day. In 2 years it will reach 1 million barrels of oil a day.

The U.S. currently consumes 13 million barrels of oil a day. If this project is successful, profitable, and can be ramped up we stand a good chance at being able to eliminate our dependence on foreign oil.

I am cautiously optimistic that this program will work. After all, our history is riddled with dark times that were brought to light by the mother of invention. Something such as using bacteria to produce oil from waste could be a world changing phenomenon. No more oil wars. No more energy woes. It would help us pave the way for a cleaner, safer, and earth friendly energy future.

Often at moments in our history it has been the great inventors that have blazed trails to the future. I hope this is one of those moments.

U.S. green lights 'anything into oil'

Defense Department OKs facilities turning natural produce into energy

By Joe Kovacs
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

Naturally occurring bacteria used to convert biomass into hydrocarbons.

A Georgia company looking to solve America's energy problem has finally teamed up with the federal government, hoping to make millions of barrels of oil every day from virtually anything that grows out of the Earth.

Bell Bio-Energy, Inc. says it has reached an agreement with the U.S. Defense Department to build seven test production plants, mostly on military bases, to quickly turn naturally grown material into fuel. Continues Here

Anything that grows 'can convert into oil'

Company finds natural solution that turns plants into gasoline

By Joe Kovacs
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

After three years of clandestine development, a Georgia company is now going public with a simple, natural way to convert anything that grows out of the Earth into oil.

J.C. Bell, an agricultural researcher and CEO of Bell Bio-Energy, Inc., says he's isolated and modified specific bacteria that will, on a very large scale, naturally change plant material – including the leftovers from food – into hydrocarbons to fuel cars and trucks.

"What we're doing is taking the trash like corn stalks, corn husks, corn cobs – even grass from the yard that goes to the dump – that's what we can turn into oil," Bell told WND. "I'm not going to make asphalt, we're only going to make the things we need. We're going to make gasoline for driving, diesel for our big trucks." Continues Here

Cross Posted at Revolutionay Paradigm

Posted by PoliShifter at 10:24 AM | Permalink | Comments (1) | TrackBacks (0)

There's been a lot happening over the past couple days so I just wanted to touch on a few areas today.

First Up Shoe Lady:

"This is not 1968 and the invasion of Czechoslovakia where Russia can threaten a neighbor, occupy a capital, overthrow a government and get away with it," Rice said just hours before leaving for France. "Things have changed."

Uh yeah...tell that to Iraq and Afghanistan. Oh wait, I guess since they aren't our "neighbors" they don't count...

Next Up Consigliere:

"Not every wrong, or even every violation of the law, is a crime.

Attorney General Michael Mukasey

Lest we forget who helped confirm Mukasey...DEMOCRATS

Schumer and Feinstein Back Mukasey

November 2, 2007 WASHINGTON, Nov. 2 — The confirmation of Michael B. Mukasey as attorney general seemed all but assured late this afternoon when Senators Charles E. Schumer and Dianne Feinstein, two Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, announced that they would vote in favor of the nominee.

McCain gets his warmongering thrown back in his face...Saakashvili calls out McCain:

“Yesterday, I heard Sen. McCain say, ‘We are all Georgians now,’” Saakashvili said on CNN’s American Morning. “Well, very nice, you know, very cheering for us to hear that, but OK, it’s time to pass from this. From words to deeds.”

McCain told a crowd in Pennsylvania yesterday that he had called Saakashvili to express solidarity with the people of Georgia, saying: “Today, we are all Georgians.”

It still seems to me that this whole thing was orchestrated with the U.S. telling Saakashvili they would back him as he invaded South Ossetia only to have the U.S. go watch the Olympics while thousands of civilians died. The U.S. had to know Russia was prepared to invade and push Georgia out of South Ossetia. I don't know why Bush insists on poking the bear but he keeps on doing it.

Arkansas Democratic Party Chairman Bill Gwatney Killed In Shooting

I am just wondering when it will be made official that Liberals and Democrats are targets.

Note to right wing crazies: If you lose your job and get pissed off it's Republicans you should be blaming NOT Democrats.

Final Note: John Edwards is NOT the Democratic Nominee. He holds no public office. He is a private citizen. Not sure why he is STILL being talked about 24/7. Hasn't the news figured out we are on the brink of nuclear war with Russia and we got bonzos like Bush, Cheney, and Rice in charge? There are bigger things to talk about than Edwards and Hunter.

Posted by PoliShifter at 08:57 AM | Permalink | Comments (3) | TrackBacks (0)